<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Procedural Content Generation Google group</title>
		<link>http://pcg.wikidot.com/forum/t-191931/procedural-content-generation-google-group</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;Procedural Content Generation Google group&quot; - A pointer to the Google Group on PCG</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 03:44:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://pcg.wikidot.com/forum/t-191931#post-618189</guid>
				<title>Procedural Content Generation Google group</title>
				<link>http://pcg.wikidot.com/forum/t-191931/procedural-content-generation-google-group#post-618189</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>andrewdoull</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>125736</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Hi all,</p> <p>Julian Togelius has set up a Google group for PCG at <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/proceduralcontent">http://groups.google.com/group/proceduralcontent</a> which appears to already have more discussion other than housekeeping than the forums here. I'd like to invite regular contributors to join the group - I suspect we should perhaps have a brief poll here on whether we should close down the forums here other than the General Discussion forum.</p> <p>Regards,</p> <p>Andrew</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>