Pcg-taxonomy to pcg-algorithm: _concepts

Summary:

Discuss changing the PCG-taxonomy articles to be a subset of PCG-algorithms.

Pcg-taxonomy to pcg-algorithm: _concepts

andrewdoull 1247805680|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

Hi guys,

Having set up a fairly rigid taxonomy of thinking about PCG types, I think it's time to break it down. There's a couple of reasons why:

1. It's too difficult to spell taxonomy.
2. I've created this pcg-algorithm: _concepts tag and want to use it.

So if no one has any objections in the next couple of days, I'll move these across.

Of course, there's an equally valid argument to go 'why are these algorithms at all?'. They're not. They're higher level concepts. But they lie close to algorithms on the thinking about 'how do I implement the creation of procedural concept.'

Thoughts?

Andrew

last edited on 1247869852|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover by andrewdoull + show more

Re: Pcg-taxonomy to pcg-algorithm: _concepts

droid 1247844651|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

No objections here. That is probably the best way to arrange things.

Re: Pcg-taxonomy to pcg-algorithm: _concepts

andrewdoull 1247869818|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

Go Droid. Nice article on identify systems…

Re: Pcg-taxonomy to pcg-algorithm: _concepts

andrewdoull 1247871916|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

I've also added in Teleological and Ontogenetic sections to the main Code page, so feel free to add _teleological and _ontogenetic tags to pcg-algorithm pages as required.

Re: Pcg-taxonomy to pcg-algorithm: _concepts

andrewdoull 1247874140|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

Just realised we have those tags already (nice). Or I should say: teleological and ontogenetic.

Thanks to whomever set those up.